<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox vs IE in Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/</link>
	<description>Now Located at blogpond.com.au!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:53:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Hi David

Thanks for feeding back those stats - they are showing closer to what Onestat and Neilsen reported.

I had another look at both dLook and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.obits.com.au&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obits&lt;/a&gt;. Funnily Obits is showing a bit higher on Firefox usage than dLook. Obits is running a bit over 11% whereas dLook just over 10.

But &lt;a href=&quot;http://dating.dlook.com.au&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;dLook Dating&lt;/a&gt; is showing 30.8% Firefox, which is very interesting.

Cheers, and good luck with webmenu :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David</p>
<p>Thanks for feeding back those stats &#8211; they are showing closer to what Onestat and Neilsen reported.</p>
<p>I had another look at both dLook and <a href="http://www.obits.com.au" rel="nofollow">Obits</a>. Funnily Obits is showing a bit higher on Firefox usage than dLook. Obits is running a bit over 11% whereas dLook just over 10.</p>
<p>But <a href="http://dating.dlook.com.au" rel="nofollow">dLook Dating</a> is showing 30.8% Firefox, which is very interesting.</p>
<p>Cheers, and good luck with webmenu <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-335</guid>
		<description>So far this year, we&#039;ve had 76% IE users, 19% Firefox users, 4% Safari users and 1% comprised of Opera, Netscape, etc.

This is for webmenu.com.au, which has 99% of its users from Adelaide and content relating to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webmenu.com.au&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;restaurants&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far this year, we&#8217;ve had 76% IE users, 19% Firefox users, 4% Safari users and 1% comprised of Opera, Netscape, etc.</p>
<p>This is for webmenu.com.au, which has 99% of its users from Adelaide and content relating to <a href="http://www.webmenu.com.au" rel="nofollow">restaurants</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 02:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Hey Becky

Thanks for dropping in. I think people from Massachusetts rock too ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Becky</p>
<p>Thanks for dropping in. I think people from Massachusetts rock too <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how anyone could possibly prefer IE over Firefox.

Since I flunked statistics I will not comment on the particulars except to say I think this also shows that Aussies Rock!

~Becky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how anyone could possibly prefer IE over Firefox.</p>
<p>Since I flunked statistics I will not comment on the particulars except to say I think this also shows that Aussies Rock!</p>
<p>~Becky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 06:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Hi Craig

Thanks for reporting those stats. Yes I can see how it&#039;s particularly dependent on the audience demographic.

I just think that if the media are going to quote trends, then they ought to be across the spectrum, rather than a skewed demographic.

I might just do that Google search...when I&#039;m feeling motivated ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Craig</p>
<p>Thanks for reporting those stats. Yes I can see how it&#8217;s particularly dependent on the audience demographic.</p>
<p>I just think that if the media are going to quote trends, then they ought to be across the spectrum, rather than a skewed demographic.</p>
<p>I might just do that Google search&#8230;when I&#8217;m feeling motivated <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 06:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Hi Meg,

Most of the stat&#039;s I see on browser breakdown are heavily influenced by audience demographic. 

Some of the tech blogs I read have up to 85% Firefox, whereas most consumer sites appear to hover at 10-20%. The more &quot;portal&quot; orientated the lower the percentage too. While not an aussie domain(or host), so I don&#039;t get any google au love - my techish blog is 65% Firefox and 30% IE while my personal blog is 77% IE and 19% Firefox.

FWIW, I just had a look at Darren Rowse&#039;s Religious livingroom.com.au/blog and his sitemeter reports 84% IE and 17% Firefox.

You could google for other open .au sitemeter sites for comparison if your not as lazy as I am...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Meg,</p>
<p>Most of the stat&#8217;s I see on browser breakdown are heavily influenced by audience demographic. </p>
<p>Some of the tech blogs I read have up to 85% Firefox, whereas most consumer sites appear to hover at 10-20%. The more &#8220;portal&#8221; orientated the lower the percentage too. While not an aussie domain(or host), so I don&#8217;t get any google au love &#8211; my techish blog is 65% Firefox and 30% IE while my personal blog is 77% IE and 19% Firefox.</p>
<p>FWIW, I just had a look at Darren Rowse&#8217;s Religious livingroom.com.au/blog and his sitemeter reports 84% IE and 17% Firefox.</p>
<p>You could google for other open .au sitemeter sites for comparison if your not as lazy as I am&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 01:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Hi Donnie

Wow!

Do you think your &quot;average&quot; visitor might be more &quot;technically savvy&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Donnie</p>
<p>Wow!</p>
<p>Do you think your &#8220;average&#8221; visitor might be more &#8220;technically savvy&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donnie Lam</title>
		<link>http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie Lam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Interesting!

Accure seems to be close to the national penetration rate for Mozilla.

2006 - 19.5%
2007 (so far) - 25.2%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting!</p>
<p>Accure seems to be close to the national penetration rate for Mozilla.</p>
<p>2006 &#8211; 19.5%<br />
2007 (so far) &#8211; 25.2%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Well, the mainstream press are reporting the myth about market penetration, but the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tall_poppy_syndrome&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tall Poppy Syndrome&lt;/a&gt;&quot; has always been alive and well in this country.

As for usability functions, these are reported from this user&#039;s personal experience not from any &quot;Myths&quot;.

Thanks for the link, though. Interesting.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the mainstream press are reporting the myth about market penetration, but the &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tall_poppy_syndrome" rel="nofollow">Tall Poppy Syndrome</a>&#8221; has always been alive and well in this country.</p>
<p>As for usability functions, these are reported from this user&#8217;s personal experience not from any &#8220;Myths&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thanks for the link, though. Interesting&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogpond.wordpress.com/2007/02/13/firefox-vs-ie-in-australia/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>So that means more people are falling for the Myths in Australia? And I like Aussies. Get the facts: www.FirefoxMyths.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that means more people are falling for the Myths in Australia? And I like Aussies. Get the facts: <a href="http://www.FirefoxMyths.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.FirefoxMyths.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
